Legal Opinion
Continental Rubber Works v. Single Tube Automobile & Bicycle Tire Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 8, 1910No. Nos. 92, 1,309PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Suit in equity by the Single Tube Automobile & Bicycle Tire Company against the Continental Rubber Works. Decree for complainant (174 Fed. 50), and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
BANNING, Circuit Judge.
The patent in suit is No. 497,971, and was granted May S3, 1893, to the inventor, Pardon W. Tillinghast. It is for an improvement in pneumatic tires. The only claim involved in the present litigation is claim S, which reads as follows:
“A pneumatic, tire, composed of a rubber tube, an intermediate layer of fabric, and an outer, covering of rubber, substantially as described, having all its rubber joints and component parts simultaneously vulcanized together, forming an integral annular tire.”
*453The claim was sustained by the Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Automatic Weighing Mach. Co. v. Pneumatic Scale Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1909
- Christie v. SeyboldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
- McCormick Harvesting Mach. Co. v. Minneapolis Harvester WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1890
- Dodge v. PorterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1899
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stead Lens Co. v. Kryptok Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- Kryptok Co. v. Stead Lens Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1913