Legal Opinion

McCormick Harvesting Mach. Co. v. Minneapolis Harvester Works

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota

Decided April 7, 1890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Equity. Bill to determine priority of invention.

1Opinion of the Court

"NelsoN, J.

This is a suit in equity, brought, under section 4915 of the Itevised Statutes of the United States, by the complainant, to whom a patent on application was refused by the commissioner of patents, praying a decree that he is entitled, according to law, to receive a patent for his invention relating to improvements in grain-binders, as specified in the following claim:

“In combination with tlie knotter, a cord-holder, mounted on a swinging frame, pivoted as described, to oppose its weight to the stress of the cord, a projecting arm from said frame, and a earn upon a revolving shaft,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Standard Cartridge Co. v. Peters Cartridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  2. Harper v. ZimmermannDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1930
  3. Bullock Electric Mfg. Co. v. Crocker-Wheeler Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1905
  4. General Electric Co. v. De Forest Radio Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1928
  5. Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. Rainbow Light, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API