Legal Opinion

Northwestern State Bank of Luverne v. Gangestad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 19, 1979No. 49377, 49404 and 49455PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

The plaintiff bank brought this action to enforce a number of promissory notes and installment contracts against the defendant, a farmer. The defendant raised the affirmative defenses of usury and hindrance of performance by the plaintiff and counterclaimed for fraud. Following a jury trial, the Rock County District Court granted the plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict and dismissed the counterclaim. The court subsequently held that two of the notes were usurious when made, but were enforceable because not presently usurious. The defendant appealed the judgment for the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Vandeputte v. SoderholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Dahmes v. Industrial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Sullivan v. F. D. Chapman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Wabasso State Bank v. Caldwell Packing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. RJM Sales & Marketing, Inc. v. Banfi Products Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1982
  2. Iten Leasing Co., a Minnesota Corporation v. Burroughs Corporation, a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Albert Lea v. GuildnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Amoco Oil Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Currie State Bank v. SchmitzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API