Legal Opinion

Lyberg v. Holz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1927No. 20678. Department OnePublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This is an action to recover for the alleged wrongful death of the infant child of the plaintiffs. Trial was had to a jury, which rendered a verdict for the defendants. A motion for a new trial was interposed and denied. Judgment of dismissal was entered on the verdict, and the plaintiffs have appealed.

The sole question raised here is: Did the trial court err in refusing to grant a new trial on the ground of misconduct on the part of the jury? The facts thought to establish misconduct are shown by the affidavits of three of the jurors. There are no controverting affidavits, and the facts set…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Ralton v. Sherwood Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. McChesneyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Henslin v. PrattWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Richards v. Overlake Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  3. Halverson v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Lockwood v. a C & S, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  5. Mathisen v. NortonWashington Supreme Court · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API