Legal Opinion

Universal Underwriters Group v. Pierson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 17, 2003No. 1-01-2818PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNULTY

When an auto dealer allows a customer to drive one of its vehicles and an accident results, Illinois law clearly provides that the dealer’s insurer must cover damages inflicted on third parties, notwithstanding any policy language to the contrary. The parties to the instant appeal ask us to decide whether applicable statutory and contractual principles require the dealer’s insurer to defend and indemnify the driver for damages to the dealer’s car. The trial court found no such requirement, and we affirm.

Plaintiff Universal Underwriters Group, as subrogee of its insured, Benoy Motor Sales,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Universal Underwriters GroupIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Storm & Associates, Ltd. v. CuculichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. McNeilab, Inc. v. North River InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  5. Benge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'Callaghan v. SatherlieAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  2. Progressive Universal Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Universal Underwriters Group v. HeibelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  4. Farmers Automobile Insurance v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. Farmers Automobile Insurance Ass'n v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API