Legal Opinion

Farmers Automobile Insurance v. Universal Underwriters Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 17, 2004No. 1-02-3551PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley

Plaintiff Farmers Automobile Insurance Association (Farmers) appeals from an order of the trial court granting defendant Universal Underwriters Insurance Company’s (Universal) motion to dismiss, holding that Universal did not owe collision coverage to Farmers’ three insureds. In the instant appeal, Farmers asks us to determine whether the dealer’s insurer, Universal, is required to indemnify the drivers for collision damages to dealer-owned automobiles. The trial court found no such requirement, and we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Farmers’ three insureds, driving auto dealer vehicles with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Universal Underwriters GroupIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Landeros v. Equity Property and DevelopmentAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. Kingbrook, Inc. v. PupursIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Chelkova v. Southland Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Universal Underwriters Group v. HeibelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  2. Itasca Bank & Trust Co. v. Thorleif Larsen & Son, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. People v. OlsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  4. Itasca Bank & Trust Co. v. Thorleif Larsen & Son, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API