Legal Opinion

Lund v. Benoit (In Re Lund)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont

Decided May 6, 2004No. 12-10784PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE

COLLEEN A. BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Plaintiff-Debtor, Robert M. Lund, moved for summary judgment that the Defendant’s ex parte prejudgment writ of attachment against his Concord, Vermont homestead is avoidable as a preferential transfer pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 547(b) or, alternatively, because it impairs his homestead exemption pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1)(A). 1 See doc. #53. The De fendant-Creditor, Bonnie M. Benoit, counter claimed to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Joseph F. Cada v. Baxter Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Kevin Smith v. Michael McGinnis Superintendent, Southport Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re SpinksUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API