Town of Andover's Appeal From Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtAveby, J.
The plaintiff town of Andover took this appeal from an order or final decision of the public utilities commission filed March 20th, 1930; and, as reasons of appeal, alleged generally that the decision was unjust, unreasonable, inexpedient, illegal, and against public policy; and was rendered by the commission arbitrarily and without authority of law. Attached to the appeal, and made a part thereof as exhibits, are the orders and proceedings of the commission in respect of the matter. These set forth in great detail the various steps taken, together with a statement of the evidence at the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holley v. SunderlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Ackerman v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Deflumeri v. SunderlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Modeste v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Spencer's Appeal From Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Application of Dakota Transp. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
- Brennan v. RussellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1970
- Huntington Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Simkins Industries, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1970