Legal Opinion
Huntington Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 8, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAveet, J.
December 18th, 1930, twenty-four residents of the White Hills district in the town of Shelton requested the Southern New England Telephone Company to supply them with telephones in their respective residences. February 19th, 1931, it notified the petitioners of its refusal on the ground that the Huntington Telephone Company stood ready to afford the services requested, and that it would cause serious embarrassment to tha,t company if they were supplied by the other. Thereafter, July 15th, 1931, the applicants petitioned the public utilities commission for an order directing the Southern New…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Thomas v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. Hartford & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Beaverdale Memorial Park, Inc. v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Loglisci v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Kram v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Gwiazda v. BerginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- W. T. Grant Co. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.