Hammond Lead Products, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Maletz, Judge:
This is a protest by an American manufacturer under section 516(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1516 (b)). The protest challenges the finding of the Secretary of the Treasury that no bounty or grant, as defined in section 303 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1303), had been paid or bestowed by the Mexican Government upon certain litharge1 that was manufac*139tured in Mexico and imported into tlie United States. See T.D. 67-142 (1967). TRe litharge was classified by the collector under item 473.52 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States at 1.25 cents…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Louisiana v. McAdooSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Bullocks, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
- Downs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Bradford Co. v. American Lithographic Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Downs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The United States (Ralph Valls, Party-In-Interest) v. Hammond Lead Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- ASG Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Hammond Lead Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- The United States (Ralph Valls, Party-In-Interest) v. Hammond Lead Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971