Zenith Radio Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1ConcurrenceNewman, Judge
While I join in the opinion of Judge Richardson, which concludes that the remission of the commodity tax on the exportation of the subject Japanese consumer electronic products1 constitutes the bestowal of a bounty or grant under our countervailing duty law, I add this concurring opinion to that of Judge Boe to elaborate on my views concerning the pivotal issues raised in the briefs of the parties.
We are confronted with an issue of grave import affecting a broad spectrum of this nation’s international trade, as well as a substantial segment of the domestic industry in the United States.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. PassavantSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- G. S. Nicholas & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Downs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- The United States (Ralph Valls, Party-In-Interest) v. Hammond Lead Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- American Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.