Legal Opinion

Wilson & Moseley v. Aetna Insurance

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 12, 1896No. 1432PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Associate Justice.

This is an action by appellant against appellee on an insurance policy of the latter in favor of the former, in which it is provided that “this entire policy shall be void, unless otherwise provided by agreement endorsed hereon or added hereto, it the insured now has or shall hereafter make or procure any other contract of insurance, whether valid or not, on the property covered in whole or in part by this policy;” the policy permitting $1875 additional insurance on the property. Defendant set up a violation of the foregoing clause of the policy by the subsequent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hubbard & Spencer v. Hartford Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. East Texas Fire Insurance v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Tyler v. Ætna Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  4. New York Central Insurance v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Thomas v. Builders' Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kelley v. American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  2. American Insurance v. KelleyTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. British American Assur. Co. of Toronto v. Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. Mechanics' & Traders' Ins. Co. v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Southern Nat. Ins. Co. of Austin v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API