Andrews v. Parker
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Panola. Tried below before the Hon. George Lane. This is a suit instituted by Wm. T. Parker et al., as heirs of Mary Tuttle, deceased, against Amanda Andrews, to remove cloud and try title to 160 acres of land, situated in Panola county, it being a part of Daniel Tuttle’s league.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Panola. Tried below before the Hon. George Lane. This is a suit instituted by Wm. T. Parker et al., as heirs of Mary Tuttle, deceased, against Amanda Andrews, to remove cloud and try title to 160 acres of land, situated in Panola county, it being a part of Daniel Tuttle’s league. The plaintiffs rested their title mainly upon the ten years’ statute of limitation, and the fact that Erastus Andrews, husband of the said Amanda Andrews, went into possession of the land and premises by permission of the heirs of Mary Tuttle. The facts in evidence were as follows, viz.: Daniel and Mary…
1Opinion of the Court
Roberts, Chief Justice.
This record presents a case in which nearly everything alleged, and nearly everything of*98fered in evidence by the plaintiffs, in support of their cause of action and the rulings of the court and findings of the jury, in all parts of the trial, are objected to by the defendants and assigned as error, by which the whole ease is substantially removed from the District Court to be retried, on appeal, in the Supreme Court. But, as it would appear from the briefs of counsel, the main objections relied on are as follows, to wit:
1st. The court erred in not suppressing the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Juneman v. FranklinTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- McDannell & Co. v. CherryTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Richardson v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- H. K. & F. B. Thurber & Co. v. ConnersTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Bull v. BeardenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.