Legal Opinion

Bull v. Bearden

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 5, 1913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order upon an ex parte hearing, granting an injunction upon- the following petition: “Petitioners, T. P. Bearden and W. N. Cox, composing the firm of Bearden & Cox,, complaining of S. B. Britton and George W. Bull, represent that both plaintiffs and defendants reside in Palo Pinto county, - Tex. That plaintiffs own in fee simple the land and premises hereinafter described and are entitled to the possession of same. That heretofore on the 13th day of May, 1913, the defendants forcibly entered upon said premises,, seized and occupied same, and continue…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rowell v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Dean v. State Ex Rel. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Juneman v. FranklinTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. McDannell & Co. v. CherryTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. State v. Bank of CommerceNebraska Supreme Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hartzog v. Seeger Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Dews v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Hightower v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Planters' Oil Co. v. GreshamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Dempsey v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API