Rushing v. Ellis
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
It is contended by the defendants that we should not consider the amended pleadings which were filed after the hearing on the motion for summary judgment but prior to the rendition of the judge’s order. Section 15 of the Civil Practice Act (Code Ann. § 81A-115 (a); Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 627; 1968, pp. 1104, 1106) provides: "A party may amend his pleading as a matter of course and without leave of court at any time before the entry of a pretrial order.” Paragraph (c) of the same section provides: "Whenever the claim or defense asserted in the amended pleading arose out of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ginn v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Harrison v. TuggleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Colonial Stores, Inc. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Werbin & Tenenbaum, Inc. v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Anderson v. CrippenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Haskins v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Sasser & Co. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Modern Roofing & Metal Works, Inc. v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Dickerson v. HulseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Dutton v. DykesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.