Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 24, 1996No. 1 CA-CR 95-0101PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge.

Melvin Scott (defendant) appeals his convictions and sentences imposed for two counts of sale of a narcotic drug. He raises the issue whether the trial court erred in denying him probation without a finding by the jury on the “threshold amount” of drugs sold. Because ,we conclude that the trial court had the authority to determine “threshold amount,” we affirm.

FACTS

On February 17, 1994, defendant was indicted for three counts of sale of a narcotic drug, class two felonies in violation of Ariz. Rev.Stat.Ann. (AR.S.) § 13-3408. The indictment alleged that all three counts…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. State v. HurleyArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. ShingArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. PowersArizona Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. VirgoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. State v. NavarroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. State of Arizona v. Glen Leo GagnonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API