City of Seattle v. Hawley
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
Having been charged with, and convicted of, violations of the Seattle traffic ordinance, defendant appealed to the superior court, where he was found guilty by a jury of negligent and of “hit and run” driving. He appeals from the judgment and sentence entered on the verdict.
Only one question is raised upon the appeal: Whether, during the trial, appellant’s rights under Art. I, § 9, of the state constitution were violated. That section provides: “No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to give evidence against himself, . . .”
This court has repeatedly held that any comment or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. ComerWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. PaschallWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- State v. PavelichWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. SmokalemWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Shelton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1990