O'Dell v. Little
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 23 — ESTOPPEL APPEAL PROM JEFPERSON COURT COMMON PLEAS. No brief. 1. Having conveyed the exchanged property to another, appellant is estopped to claim the property in controversy. 2. Appellant’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations. Gossom v. Donaldson, 18 B. Mon., 239; Medlock v. Suter, 80 Ky.
Read the full summary
Case 23 — ESTOPPEL APPEAL PROM JEFPERSON COURT COMMON PLEAS. No brief. 1. Having conveyed the exchanged property to another, appellant is estopped to claim the property in controversy. 2. Appellant’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations. Gossom v. Donaldson, 18 B. Mon., 239; Medlock v. Suter, 80 Ky. Rep., 101; 10 Bush, 260; Bailey v. Bamberger, 11 B. Mon., 115; Bryant v. Pollinger, 6 Bush, 473; Petty v..Roberts, 7 lb., 410; Hopson v. Boyd, 6 B. M., 300; 1 B. Mon., 291; Craddock v. Tyler, 3 Bush, 360; Connolly v. Branstetter, 3 Jo., 702.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE PRYOR
delivered the opinion of the court.
John P. Cochran at Ms death left surviving him his two daughters, Mrs. O’Dell, the appellant in this case, and Mrs. Eliza Little, the appellee, the husband of Mrs. Little being a party to the appeal. The real estate of the daughters was allotted to them, and conveyance made by which each was invested with title to her portion of the inheritance. After this was. done, they ex*147••changed their respective parcels, the one for the other.' Mrs. Little and her husband conveyed to Mrs. O’Dell, .and the latter conveyed- to Mrs. Little.
After the conveyance…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Big Sandy Co. v. RameyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Hargis v. Flesher Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Onions v. Covington & Cincinnati El. R. R. & Transfer & Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Blanton v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Potter v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.