In Re Will of Brown
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The conflict in the charge on a material issue entitles the propounder to a new trial. It is well settled that where there are conflicting instructions witb respect to a material matter, a new trial must be granted, as tbe jurors are not supposed to know wbicb one of tbe two states tbe law correctly, and we cannot say tbey did not follow tbe erroneous instruction. S. v. Falkner, 182 N. C., 793, 108 S. E., 756; Edwards v. R. R., 132 N. C., 99, 43 S. E., 585.
Again, it bas been tbe law of tbis jurisdiction, since tbe decision in Mayo v. Jones, 78 N. C., 402, that, upon tbe trial of an issue of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Edwards v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- State v. . FalknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- In Re Daniel Burns' WillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- In Re Will of RawlingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Mayo v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stormon v. WeissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
- In Re Will of ReddingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- In Re the Will of PridgenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- In Re the Will of SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Matter of Will of WomackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.