In Re the Will of Simmons
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
We have examined carefully the assignments of error with reference to the admission and exclusion of evidence. We find no merit therein.
There was no error in the instructions to the jury, above mentioned, nor in the instruction with reference to the test of mental capacity to make a will, to which the caveator also excepted. In Re Craven, 169 N.C. 661, 86 S.E. 587. The burden was upon the cave-ator to prove that, at the time the will was executed, Simmons did not have the mental capacity required for the execution of a will. In Re Will of Isley, 263 N.C. 239, 139 S.E. 2d 243; In Re Will of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Will of CravenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- In Re Will of ThorpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- In Re the Last Will & Testament of WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- In Re Will of BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- In Re Isley's WillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of Will of JarvisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- In Re Will of MucciCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- In Re Will of MucciCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- In re the Purported Will of AndrewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- In re the Will of WestonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978