Legal Opinion

State v. Lyon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1987No. TC 23-853; CA A35195; SC S33792PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*223CAMPBELL, J.

In State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 445, 687 P2d 751 (1984), we held that polygraph evidence is not admissible, over proper objection, in any civil or criminal trial in this state. We reserved opinion as to the admissibility of such evidence pursuant to a preexamination stipulation. Id. at 445 n 35. We accepted review of this case to resolve that issue. For the reasons set out below, we hold that polygraph test results are inadmissible as evidence in the courts of this state, even when admissibility has been stipulated by the parties.

Defendant was convicted of murder in the shooting…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. BaynesIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. MartiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  5. State v. SparklinOregon Supreme Court · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Smith v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. TerryOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. HarbertsOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. MendesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API