Legal Opinion

United States v. Haslage

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 3, 2017No. 16-3095, No. 16-3196PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, Chief Judge.

In Nichols v. United States, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 1113, 194 L.Ed.2d 324 (2016), the Supreme Court held that a sex offender was not required under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), 18 U.S.C, § 2250, to update his registration in the state where he had been residing, after he left his home and moved to a new place. In Nichols, the new place was outside the United States, in the Philippines. The two cases we have consolidated for disposition on appeal present the more conventional scenario of a person who moves from one state in the United States to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Rodriguez-MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Carr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. United States v. Richard O'HaraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. United States v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. HolcombeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Charles Spivey, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. SewardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  4. Leon v. RuizDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020
  5. United States v. HolcombeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API