Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Wheat Rail Freight Rate Antitrust Litigation. Appeals of Little Crow Milling Co., Inc., Midstate Mills Inc., Dca Food Industries Inc., General Mills, Inc., and the Pillsbury Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 20, 1985No. 84-1383PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

759 F.2d 1305

1985-1 Trade Cases 66,571

In the Matter of WHEAT RAIL FREIGHT RATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION.

Appeals of LITTLE CROW MILLING CO., INC., Midstate Mills

Inc., DCA Food Industries Inc., General Mills,

Inc., and The Pillsbury Company.

Nos. 84-1383, 84-1449 and 84-1505.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Argued Nov. 14, 1984.

Decided April 17, 1985.

As Amended May 20, 1985.

Ralph Sauarese, Howrey & Simon, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.

Steve McGisech, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae.

Laurence Z. Shiekman, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Illinois Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1990
  2. Ocean Logistics Management, Inc. v. NPR, INC.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API