Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Haberstock

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1937No. 26,928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoll, J.

On July 8, 1931, appellant filed her complaint in the Superior Court of Allen County, Indiana, against Mathilda Haberstock and Anton Haberstock on a promissory note and to foreclose a real estate mortgage of same date given to secure such note. The Haberstocks appeared and filed a special answer of partial payment, and on December 2, 1931, judgment was rendered against Haberstock and Haberstock for the sum of $4,745.00 and $402.75 attorney fees, plus costs, and decreed a foreclosure of the mortgage. Thereafter, on December 31, 1931, the real estate described in the mortgage was duly sold by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holmes v. BybeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Sterne v. VertIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Poffinbarger v. SumnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Cummings v. PottingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Hibben, Hollweg & Co. v. Western & Southern Life InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dahlin v. Amoco Oil Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Watson v. StrohlIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co v. Mark Dill Plumbing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Dahlin v. Amoco Oil Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. LANE, ETC. v. HobbsIndiana Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API