Legal Opinion
Toensing v. Brown
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 25, 1974No. C-73-0753-CBRPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND JUDGMENT
RENFREW, District Judge.
The named plaintiffs, retired carpenters eligible for retirement benefits from the Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for Northern California, have brought this suit as a class action under Rule 23, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, challenging the administration of that Trust Fund by defendants, current and former trustees of the Trust Fund. Plaintiffs invoke this Court’s jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C. § 186(e) and 28 U.S.C. § 1337, and also under the doctrine of pendent jurisdiction.
Plaintiffs have stated two causes of action. First, they…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gustave D. Toensing v. E. A. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Associated Contractors of Essex County, Inc. v. Laborers International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Culinary Workers & Bartenders Union v. Gateway Cafe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- Local Union No. 5 of the Sheet Metal Workers' International Association v. Mahoning and Trumbull County Building Trades Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Barrett v. Craven County Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.