Legal Opinion

In re Durham

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 14, 1902PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Bankruptcy. Proceeding to set aside certain chattel mortgages irom the bankrupt to the Harford National Bank of Bel Air, Md.

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

The bankrupt, John J. Durham, filed his voluntary petition December 13, 1899, and was duly adjudicated. On April 19, 1900, E. Savage Shure and John S. Wallis, and subsequently other creditors of the bankrupt, filed their petitions, asking that certain bills of sale of the bankrupt’s property made by him to the Harford National Bank of Bel Air four months preceding the bankrupt’s application be set aside as illegal preferences, and made to hinder, delay, and defraud creditors. An order on the petition re*751quired the Harford National Bank of Bel Air to answer and show cause…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edelhoff & Rinke v. Horner-Miller Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  2. City National Bank of Greenville v. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1901
  3. In re WolfDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1899
  4. In re Little River Lumber Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1899
  5. In re DavidsonDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1901

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alstom Caribe, Inc. v. Geo. P. Reintjes Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  2. McEldowney v. CardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1911
  3. In re Platteville Foundry & Machine Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1906
  4. In re SachsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1927
  5. In re ScherberDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API