Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932No. Criminal No. 776PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Appellants were convicted in the superior court of Maricopa county of the crime of manufacturing’ intoxicating liquor and sentenced to serve sixty days in jail and pay a fine. Prom said judgment they have taken this appeal. While there are some seven assignments of error, they together raise hut one question, and that is whether certain evidence which was admitted as against appellants should have been suppressed by the court.

The facts in the case, taken in the strongest manner in favor of the state, as under our oft-repeated rule we must take them, may be stated as follows: On the 21st day…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Driskill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
  2. Frix v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Cumpton v. City of MuskogeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Smuk v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  5. United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PinaArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State of Arizona v. FryeArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  3. State v. PurseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Motogolf.com, LLC v. Top Shelf Golf, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API