Legal Opinion

Smuk v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 11, 1922No. 10,413PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Teller

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted of the unlawful' possession of intoxicating liquors, and brings error.

A search warrant was issued, on affidavit, under which officers proceeded to the house of defendant, which was used as a boarding house, and there found a bottle of liquor, which defendant stated was whiskey kept for his own use. They found also a considerable quantity of what defendant said was “home-brew.”

A sample of this liquor, and the bottle said to contain whiskey were admitted in evidence, as was also testimony that defendant had designated them as above…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. State v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  3. McClurg v. BrentonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Smith v. McDuffeeOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Grim v. RobinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Silverstein v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  4. State v. RowleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Capps v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API