St. Clair v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
Ralph St. Clair, the appellant, was convicted of sexual abuse of his seven-year-old stepdaughter. He contends A.R.E. 803(25)(A) permitting certain hearsay evidence to be admitted in child sexual abuse cases was unconstitutionally enacted by the general assembly after this court had declared its inherent authority to promulgate rules of evidence in Ricarte v. State, 290 Ark. 100, 717 S.W.2d 488 (1986). We hold the separation of powers doctrine does not preclude the general assembly from enacting a rule such as the one in question here. He also contends that the case must…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ricarte v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Horn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- In Re Adoption of Uniform Rules of EvidenceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Hegwood v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. SypultSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Lyons v. Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Tisdale v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Sunbelt Couriers v. McCartneyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.