Lauro v. Visnapuu
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHuff, J.
This mechanic’s lien foreclosure action was instituted by Frank Lauro, d/b/a Colonial Restoration (hereinafter Lauro). Kuldar and Sandra Visnapuu appeal from an order of the circuit court modifying an arbitration award in favor of Lauro. We reverse.1
FACTUALIPROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Frank Lauro owns and operates Colonial Restoration, a Charleston business which provides restoration and contractor services. The Visnapuus contracted with Lauro to perform a substantial restoration project on their home located on Charleston’s Meeting Street.
Lauro delivered to the Visnapuus a blank American Institute…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Trident Technical College v. Lucas & Stubbs, Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Batten v. HowellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
- PITTMAN MORTG. CO., INC. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Harris v. BennettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Seckinger v. Vessel, ExcaliburCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- C-Sculptures, LLC v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Zepsa Construction, Inc. v. RandazzoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Weimer v. JonesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Gissel v. HartCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Lauro v. VisnapuuCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.