Legal Opinion

Batten v. Howell

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 5, 1990No. 1451PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sanders, Chief Judge:

Both parties are “realtors.” Appellant Realtor Allen Howell, Howell & Associates and respondent Realtor Daniel Batten, Batten & Tarrant became involved in a dispute over whether Realtor Howell owed Realtor Batten a real estate commission in connection with the sale of a certain parcel of land. As members of the Charleston Trident Board of Realtors, they had previously agreed to submit to arbitration by the Board “all business disputes arising out of the real estate business.” Accordingly, they submitted the dispute to arbitration by the Board. They specifically agreed “to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Trident Technical College v. Lucas & Stubbs, Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Health Plan of Nevada, Inc. v. Rainbow Medical, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Sooner Builders & Investments, Inc. v. Nolan Hatcher Construction Services, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Matter of Town of Silver CityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  4. PITTMAN MORTG. CO., INC. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Arbitration Between Carlson v. Farmers Insurance Group of Companies—Farmers Insurance ExchangeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API