Legal Opinion

Lauro v. Visnapuu

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 9, 2002No. 3546Published

1Opinion of the Court

351 S.C. 507 (2002)

570 S.E.2d 551

Frank LAURO, d/b/a Colonial Restoration, Respondent,

v.

Kuldar VISNAPUU, Sandra Visnapuu, and Union Federal Savings Bank of Indianapolis, Defendants, Of Whom Kuldar Visnapuu and Sandra Visnapuu are, Appellants.

No. 3546.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Submitted May 6, 2002.

Decided September 9, 2002.

Rehearing Denied October 17, 2002.

Richard S.W. Stoney and Jay T. Gouldon, of Charleston; and James B. Richardson, Jr., of Columbia, for appellants.

Richard S. Rosen and Kevin R. Eberle, of Charleston, for respondent.

HUFF, J.

This mechanic's lien foreclosure action was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Green Giant Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  2. Trident Technical College v. Lucas & Stubbs, Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Batten v. HowellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  4. T.W. Morton Builders Inc. v. Von BuedingenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  5. PITTMAN MORTG. CO., INC. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API