Legal Opinion

J. C. Pirkle MacHinery Co. Inc. v. Walters

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1949No. 16527PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

The first question presented to this court is whether or not the restrictive covenant is a reasonable limitation as to territory.

Whether the restraints imposed by an employment contract are reasonable is a question of law for determination by the court. Rakestraw v. Lanier, 104 Ga. 188, 194 (30 S. E. 735). The restrictions imposed upon the promisor must not be larger than are necessary for the protection of the promisee. Rakestraw v. Lanier, supra. Greater latitude is allowed in those covenants relating to the sale of a business, or dissolution of a partnership, than in those…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rakestraw v. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Orkin Ex. Co. Inc., So. Georgia v. DewberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  3. Hood v. LeggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Taylor Freezer Sales Co. v. Sweden Freezer Eastern Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  2. WAKE Broadcasters, Inc. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Seaboard Industries, Inc. v. BlairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Artistic Ornamental Iron Co. v. WilkesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  5. Britt v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API