Ball v. Mudge
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Denney, J. †
In this action, plaintiffs Lynton L. Ball and Florence R. Ball, his wife, sought recovery of damages against Carl E. Mudge and wife, Bryce E. McMurry and wife, and Bernard J. Goiney and wife for alleged breach of warranty and negligence by defendant Carl E. Mudge in failing to successfully sterilize Mr. Ball in a vasectomy performed by Dr. Mudge. Verdict of a jury was for defendants and judgment was entered thereon. Plaintiffs, Ball, appeal.
Respondents are partners in the practice of medicine under the name of “Doctors’ Clinic of Lake City.” Dr. Mudge is the only respondent who…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chase v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Morner v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Christensen v. ThornbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Richison v. NunnWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Penson v. Inland Empire Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
- Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Troppi v. ScarfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Douglas v. BussabargerWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Sherlock v. Stillwater ClinicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.