Legal Opinion

State v. Potts

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 17, 1998No. 16631-7-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, C.J.

Paul Potts was convicted of possession of a controlled substance: methamphetamine. On appeal he contends the evidence at trial supports conviction for possession of only amphetamine, not methamphetamine. He also argues the evidence is insufficient that he possessed the controlled substance and the State failed to preserve material evidence. We reverse.

In September 1996, Mr. Potts asked Barbara Taylor if he could borrow her black pickup truck to help his friend, Stephanie Beidman, move. Later that day, Mr. Potts was the passenger in the pickup driven by Ms. Beidman when they were stopped by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. WittenbargerWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. StaleyWashington Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. ColquittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. State v. TreatCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. State v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. State v. TreatCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API