Legal Opinion

Matter of McDonald

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 30, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report recommending that EUGENE J. McDONALD of MATAWAN be publicly reprimanded for his violation of DR 7-102(A)(5), knowingly making a false statement of fact, and DR 1-102(A)(1), engaging in conduct involving misrepresentation and engaging in conduct that adversely reflected on his fitness to practice law, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report of the Disciplinary Review Board is hereby adopted and that EUGENE J. McDONALD be and hereby is publicly reprimanded for his violation of DR 7-102(A)(5) and DR 1-102(A)(1); and it is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re NigohosianSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. In Re GoldstaubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. In Re StoutSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. People ex rel. Attorney General v. BeattieIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. In Re GenserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of NortonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Matter of WhitmoreSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. In re BradySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  4. State v. StormNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API