Legal Opinion

Foster v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 8, 2014No. 12-4411UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRANCH, Circuit Judge.

David Foster appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habe-as corpus as procedurally defaulted in Ohio state court. He contends that the district court erred by not excusing the untimely filing of his state post-conviction petition so that his ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim could be considered on the merits. We agree, concluding that there was cause and prejudice to excuse the procedural default. Nevertheless, we AFFIRM the district court because Foster fails to establish ineffective assistance of counsel.

I. BACKGROUND

In 2005,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Neal v. WolfenbargerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  2. Hamm v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional InstituteDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  3. Hamm v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional InstituteDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  4. Hearn v. Warden, Belmont County Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
  5. Hearn v. Warden, Belmont County Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API