Javier v. DERINGER-NEY, INC.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE DEFENDANT’S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. #11]
VANESSA L. BRYANT, District Judge.
Presently pending before the court is the defendant’s partial motion to dismiss. The pro se plaintiff, Mario Javier, initiated this action against the defendant, Deringer-Ney, Inc. (“Deringer”), his former employer, claiming that it discriminated against him on the basis of race, color, national origin, ancestry or alienage, when it: 1) terminated his employment, in viola tion of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Boykin v. KeyCorpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Burgos v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey LittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Baker v. CT TransitDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020