Legal Opinion

In Re Huelskamp

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2000No. 49S00-9907-DI-399PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

The respondent, Glenn S. Huelskamp, attempted to attract new clients by sending to recently arrested individuals advertising materials which he now admits were misleading and improper. Today we approve a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline between the respondent and the Disciplinary Commission calling for a public reprimand of the respondent for that misconduct.

Having been admitted to the bar of this state in 1989, the respondent is subject to our disciplinary jurisdiction. The respondent's direct mailings which attracted disciplinary…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of SkozenIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In the Matter of AnonymousIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re FoosIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re PaciorIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In the Matter of Patrick K. RocchioIndiana Supreme Court · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API