In Re Huelskamp
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The respondent, Glenn S. Huelskamp, attempted to attract new clients by sending to recently arrested individuals advertising materials which he now admits were misleading and improper. Today we approve a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline between the respondent and the Disciplinary Commission calling for a public reprimand of the respondent for that misconduct.
Having been admitted to the bar of this state in 1989, the respondent is subject to our disciplinary jurisdiction. The respondent's direct mailings which attracted disciplinary…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of SkozenIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
4Cited by6 opinions
- In Re HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- In the Matter of AnonymousIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re FoosIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re PaciorIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Matter of Patrick K. RocchioIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.