Legal Opinion

In Re Pacior

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 2002No. 29S00-0103-DI-171PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

Because he made romantic advances toward a client in one instance, and deceptively advertised "free initial consultation" in another, we find today that the respondent here, Paul J. Pacior, violated the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law and that he should be admonished for such conduct.

This attorney disciplinary matter is before us now upon the Disciplinary Commission's and the respondent's Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline, tendered to us in anticipated resolution of the formal disciplinary charges pending against the…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re HuelskampIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re TsoutsourisIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Matter of BalesIndiana Supreme Court · 1993

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re BashIndiana Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API