Matter of Skozen
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
On August 12, 1993, the Disciplinary Commission filed a verified complaint for disciplinary action alleging that the respondent violated Rules 7.3(c) and 8.1 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. This matter now comes before us on the Commission and the respondent's proffered Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline, entered pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Seetion 11(g). 1 We approve the tendered agreement, and herein set forth the facts and cireumstances of this case.
The respondent was admitted to the bar of…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of AnonymousIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
4Cited by4 opinions
- In Re HuelskampIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- In re Theodore Studdert-Kennedy / In re PRB-021-2022 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2024
- In the Matter of Patrick K. RocchioIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- In the Matter of Patrick K. RocchioIndiana Supreme Court · 2011