Legal Opinion

Kessel v. Michaelis

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoward T. Hogan, J.

This is a proceeding brought pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review and to annul a decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Hemp-stead. The intervenors-respondents are the owners of a parcel of land at Merrick, having a frontage of 464 feet on the south side of Merrick Boad and a depth of 180 feet, zoned for business uses to a depth of 100 feet, and for residential uses for the remaining 80 feet. They sought an extension of the business use for an additional 50 feet, as permitted by section P-1.3 of the Building Zone Ordinance which reads as follows: “ Sec.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Aloe v. DasslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  3. Aloe v. DasslerNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Olp v. Town of BrightonNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Little v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. Town of RyeNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Balduf v. MichaelisNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API