Kessel v. Michaelis
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHoward T. Hogan, J.
This is a proceeding brought pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review and to annul a decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Hemp-stead. The intervenors-respondents are the owners of a parcel of land at Merrick, having a frontage of 464 feet on the south side of Merrick Boad and a depth of 180 feet, zoned for business uses to a depth of 100 feet, and for residential uses for the remaining 80 feet. They sought an extension of the business use for an additional 50 feet, as permitted by section P-1.3 of the Building Zone Ordinance which reads as follows: “ Sec.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Aloe v. DasslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Aloe v. DasslerNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Olp v. Town of BrightonNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- Little v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. Town of RyeNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Balduf v. MichaelisNew York Supreme Court · 1961