Legal Opinion

Balduf v. Michaelis

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

Respondent Board of Zoning Appeals moves to dismiss the petition in this article 78 proceeding for insufficiency. Petitioners are owners of properties adjoining or close to a night club. The property on which the night club is situated is zoned Business X as to 100 feet of its depth, and Residence B as to the remaining 50 feet of its depth. The owner and operator of the night club also owns an adjoining residential parcel. Application of the owner for a variance to permit use of the adjoining parcel for parking was denied by the Board of Zoning Appeals in a decision which noted the “…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brentmore Estates, Inc. v. Hotel Barbizon, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  2. Kessel v. MichaelisNew York Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Duffy v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API