Legal Opinion

Consolidated Edison Co. v. Town of Rye

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel W. Eager, J.

This proceeding is brought pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, and the petitioner, a gas and electric corporation, thereby seeks relief from the refusal of the authorities of the Town of Rye to issue to petitioner a permit to allow the construction and maintenance of a transformer and switchgear unit upon property owned by it situate in Residence “ R-12 ” District in said town.

The petition, insofar as it seeks an order in the nature of a mandamus order directing the Building Inspector to issue a building permit, is dismissed. There is no showing here sufficient to justify a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. People Ex Rel. Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Gilbert v. StevensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  4. Panzer v. McConnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  5. Kessel v. MichaelisNew York Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. City of FultonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  2. New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. McCabeNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API