Paquette v. Potter Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
Suit for infringement of Jacques’ patent, No. 1,586,446, May 25,1926, for a trunk. All claims were in suit and were found void of invention. The assignments of error, though varied in form, were all leveled at this holding. The specifications and drawings describe a metal trunk. The object was to provide a weather proof and dust proof trunk for use upon automobiles. Claims 1 1 and 5 2 are typical. Of course, appellant did not invent a trunk. The ordinary conception of a trunk is simply a box with a hinged lid, handles, and a lock, and while such a container is useful it…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- John E. Thropp's Sons Co. v. SeiberlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Peters v. HansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Smyth Mfg. Co. v. SheridanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
3Cited by11 opinions
- Detroit Stoker Co. v. Brownell Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Belden v. Air Control Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1956
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. Nivison-Weiskopf Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Spring-Air Co. v. RagainsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1951
- Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. Schwarze Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.