Legal Opinion

Paquette v. Potter Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 12, 1931No. 5625PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Suit for infringement of Jacques’ patent, No. 1,586,446, May 25,1926, for a trunk. All claims were in suit and were found void of invention. The assignments of error, though varied in form, were all leveled at this holding. The specifications and drawings describe a metal trunk. The object was to provide a weather proof and dust proof trunk for use upon automobiles. Claims 1 1 and 5 2 are typical. Of course, appellant did not invent a trunk. The ordinary conception of a trunk is simply a box with a hinged lid, handles, and a lock, and while such a container is useful it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John E. Thropp's Sons Co. v. SeiberlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Peters v. HansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Smyth Mfg. Co. v. SheridanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Detroit Stoker Co. v. Brownell Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  2. Belden v. Air Control Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1956
  3. Hartford-Empire Co. v. Nivison-Weiskopf Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  4. Spring-Air Co. v. RagainsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1951
  5. Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. Schwarze Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API