Jones v. Steinberger
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COTTLE, P. J.
After a court trial in a marital dissolution action, the court entered judgment regarding the character and disposition of certain property of the parties. On appeal, the husband contends that the trial court erred with regard to wife’s severance pay, certain stock options, and a diamond ring. We find no error by the trial court with regard to wife’s severance pay and the stock options, but reverse the judgment with regard to the diamond ring.
*1453I. Facts
A. Procedural Background
Petitioner Buff Jones and defendant James Mark Steinberger were married on April 30, 1988. They…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- In Re Marriage of MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re Marriage of HugCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- In Re Marriage of LehmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- DeBoer v. DeBoerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Marr. of ValliCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- In Re Marriage of SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- In re ObedianUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Marr. of ValliCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- In re Marriage of CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.