Legal Opinion

Davis v. Boly

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 15, 2010No. C061020CV, C053914CV A135508 (Control), A140872Published

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

In these consolidated cases, the appellant, Boly, contends that the trial court erred in ruling in favor of the respondent, Davis, in two related actions involving a small farm owned by Hulse, Boly’s aunt. Davis was Hulse’s attorney and, after her death in 2004, the personal representative of her estate. In his capacity as personal representative, Davis agreed to sell the farmland to a third-party developer. In the meantime, however, Boly had been negotiating with the Beaverton School District, which owned property adjoining the farmland, in order to obtain better vehicular access to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Pearson v. SigmundOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Kennedy v. Wackenhut Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Egge v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Kennedy v. Wackenhut Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API