Legal Opinion
In re Syngenta AG MIR 162 Corn Litigation
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 5, 2017No. MDL No. 2591; Case No. 14-md-2591-JWLPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1228MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
John W. Lungstrum, United States District Judge
In this multi-district litigation (MDL), plaintiffs assert various claims against defendants (collectively “Syngenta”) relating to Syngenta’s commercialization of com seed products known as Viptera and Dura-cade, containing a genetic trait known as MIR 162, without approval of MIR 162 corn by China, an export market. Plaintiffs, who did not use Syngenta’s products, allege that Syngenta’s commercialization of its products caused com containing MIR 162 to be commingled throughout the corn supply in the United States; that China…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Thom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grains Merch. LLC v. Syngenta AG (In re Syngenta AG Mir 162 Corn Litig.)District Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- The Delong Co., Inc. v. Syngenta AG REMINDER TO COUNSEL -- This case is a tag-a-long action to 14-md-2591, MDL 2591 In Re: Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation.District Court, D. Kansas · 2023
- Workman v. KretzerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021