Legal Opinion

Arrow Bonding Co. v. Warren

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 29, 2012No. 27166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pleicones

Appellant (Warren) appeals an order denying his Rule 55(c) and Rule 60(b)(1), SCRCP motions, as well as his independent motion to set aside a judgment sale. On appeal, he contests only the denial of his motion to set aside. We affirm.

FACTS

Warren is a state bail bondsman, and respondent is also in the bond business. Warren agreed to be responsible if a mutual client forfeited a surety bond issued by respondent. In October 2006, respondent obtained a $5,120.00 judgment *605against Warren after the client forfeited. In August 2007, the clerk issued a Judgment Execution, and on September 19, 2007,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pinckney v. WarrenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Ex Parte KellerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  3. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co. v. Std. Bldg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  4. Investors Savings Bank v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Norman v. NormanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Winrose Homeowners' Ass'n, Inc. v. HaleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
  2. Winrose Homeowners' Ass'n, Inc. v. HaleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
  3. Winrose Homeowners' Association v. HaleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API