Arrow Bonding Co. v. Warren
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pleicones
Appellant (Warren) appeals an order denying his Rule 55(c) and Rule 60(b)(1), SCRCP motions, as well as his independent motion to set aside a judgment sale. On appeal, he contests only the denial of his motion to set aside. We affirm.
FACTS
Warren is a state bail bondsman, and respondent is also in the bond business. Warren agreed to be responsible if a mutual client forfeited a surety bond issued by respondent. In October 2006, respondent obtained a $5,120.00 judgment *605against Warren after the client forfeited. In August 2007, the clerk issued a Judgment Execution, and on September 19, 2007,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pinckney v. WarrenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Ex Parte KellerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co. v. Std. Bldg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
- Investors Savings Bank v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
- Norman v. NormanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Winrose Homeowners' Ass'n, Inc. v. HaleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- Winrose Homeowners' Ass'n, Inc. v. HaleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- Winrose Homeowners' Association v. HaleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2019