Legal Opinion

United States v. Fabio Alonso

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 16, 1986No. 84-1082PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KANE, District Judge.

Fabio Alonso was convicted by a jury of possession of a controlled substance under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and importation of a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952(a). On appeal, Alonso raises four grounds for reversal or remand: (1) insufficiency of the evidence; (2) the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence derived from an electronic beeper device; (3) the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence gained from a warrantless arrest; and (4) the trial court’s refusal to issue Alonso’s tendered “mere presence” jury instruction.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Koch v. City of Del CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Thomas TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Arthur MaezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Rodney Lee MorganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. John FoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API